Open Access System for Information Sharing

Login Library

 

Article
Cited 38 time in webofscience Cited 38 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLEE, HYUNG JOO-
dc.contributor.authorGent, Janneane F.-
dc.contributor.authorLeaderer, Brian P.-
dc.contributor.authorKoutrakis, Petros-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-15T03:00:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-15T03:00:19Z-
dc.date.created2022-02-14-
dc.date.issued2011-05-
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697-
dc.identifier.urihttps://oasis.postech.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/109336-
dc.description.abstractTo protect public health from PM(2.5) air pollution, it is critical to identify the source types of PM(2.5) mass and chemical components associated with higher risks of adverse health outcomes. Source apportionment modeling using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF), was used to identify PM(2.5) source types and quantify the source contributions to PM(2.5) in five cities of Connecticut and Massachusetts. Spatial and temporal variability of PM(2.5) mass, components and source contributions were investigated. PMF analysis identified five source types: regional pollution as traced by sulfur, motor vehicle, road dust, oil combustion and sea salt. The sulfur-related regional pollution and traffic source type were major contributors to PM(2.5). Due to sparse ground-level PM(2.5) monitoring sites, current epidemiological studies are susceptible to exposure measurement errors. The higher correlations in concentrations and source contributions between different locations suggest less spatial variability, resulting in less exposure measurement errors. When concentrations and/or contributions were compared to regional averages, correlations were generally higher than between-site correlations. This suggests that for assigning exposures for health effects studies, using regional average concentrations or contributions from several PM(2.5) monitors is more reliable than using data from the nearest central monitor. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier BV-
dc.relation.isPartOfScience of the Total Environment-
dc.titleSpatial and temporal variability of fine particle composition and source types in five cities of Connecticut and Massachusetts-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.025-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationScience of the Total Environment, v.409, no.11, pp.2133 - 2142-
dc.identifier.wosid000290066000016-
dc.citation.endPage2142-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage2133-
dc.citation.titleScience of the Total Environment-
dc.citation.volume409-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLEE, HYUNG JOO-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79953327265-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFACTOR-ANALYTIC MODELS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPARTICULATE MATTER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAIR-POLLUTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusASTHMATIC-CHILDREN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusROAD DUST-
dc.subject.keywordPlusASSOCIATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMORTALITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAEROSOL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPM2.5-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRATES-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPM(2.5)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSource apportionment-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPositive Matrix Factorization (PMF)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSpatial variability-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTemporal variability-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorExposure measurement errors-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEnvironmental Sciences-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-

qr_code

  • mendeley

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher

이형주LEE, HYUNG JOO
Div of Environmental Science & Enginrg
Read more

Views & Downloads

Browse