Open Access System for Information Sharing

Login Library

 

Thesis
Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김영호en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-01T11:49:03Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-01T11:49:03Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.otherOAK-2014-01568en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://postech.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001673758en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oasis.postech.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/2070-
dc.descriptionMasteren_US
dc.description.abstractAs a recent global trend, the majority of plant projects are delivered through EPC or EPC-turnkey contracts, where a contractor’s liability is more complicated because of the mega size scale and financing method. Under this liabilities mechanism knowledge, it is challenging for contractors to carry out the projects without the clear liability processes and tools. Previous researches have been lacking a practical usability for project members for liabilities of contracts. Those were focused on solving the claims or schedule calculation issues only. The objective of the present study was to develop a validation process for LDs (liquidated damages) in contractor’s liabilities with various case studies and expert judgments. As summarized in this paper, the processes and tools were developed with project life cycle process. The project preparation phase includes 3 step check lists to determine the Go or No-go for projects. In progress phase, contractors should focus on the response strategies for claims with liabilities. The processes and tools were applied to case studies, which on several EPC projects in various industry disciplines such as steel making plant, power plant, offshore plant and process plant to verify the practicality. The study concludes that those developed processes and tools will help to manage risk of LDs (liquidated damages) for the contractors in the overseas projects. The limitations of this study include assessing the expert judgment with limited contractual documents. For this reason, the limitation warrants future studies using multiple project teams and related documents to examine a more usability for the developed process and tools. Also, further studies should rely on not only organization’s features for project but also characteristics which are unusable to control to derive more significant results.en_US
dc.languagekoren_US
dc.publisher포항공과대학교en_US
dc.rightsBY_NC_NDen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kren_US
dc.title해외프로젝트 사례를 통한 손해배상(LDs)연구 및 계약자 대응방안 개발en_US
dc.title.alternativeDevelopment of Review Processes and Tools for Liquidated Damages for EPC/Turnkey Projects: Contractor’s Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.college일반대학원 엔지니어링특성화협동과정en_US
dc.date.degree2014- 2en_US
dc.type.docTypeThesis-

qr_code

  • mendeley

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Views & Downloads

Browse